College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

An Open Letter to Nadya Suleman

Student Column

By Samantha Villanueva

|

Published: Monday, April 20, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, April 21, 2009

OCTOMOM

wfnx.com

Dear Octomom… I mean Nadya Suleman,

You have been all over the news in the past few months due to your recent delivery of eight babies that were conceived via artificial insemination. Many people have trouble with just one baby. You decided to have eight babies despite the fact that you don’t have a job, you don’t have a husband or a boyfriend to help you with the babies, oh and you have six other kids. Given all these conditions, what the heck are you going to do with eight babies?

Maybe you got the idea from that show ‘Eight is Enough’ and thought, “Hey, that worked out okay”. However, the children were not babies and there were two parents to take care of the children. Plus, even though some people do have large families, it was just a TV show.

Maybe you really wanted to collect something. Some people collect coins, some collect shoes, but you decided to collect children. They may look cute and solicit complements, but children are living things that require quite a bit of maintenance and attention.

Which reminds me, why do I always see pictures of you shopping? I saw a picture of you at Target and when you left, you had multiple cartfuls of stuff, but only one bag of diapers. That should last, what, a day? And then there was a report that you spent $1000 at a MAC cosmetics store. That’s pricey stuff! I have a job and no kids and I don’t even buy MAC makeup. Plus, who are you trying to impress? Sorry to say it, but you’ll be hard-pressed to find a guy who isn’t bothered by all that extra baggage.

Also, what’s up with the whole Angelina Jolie thing? You look eerily similar to her. There’s the dark hair and fair skin, the very plump lips, plus she has a pretty big family as well. Angelina Jolie claimed to be “freaked out” by the thought that you were trying to emulate her. You claimed that you weren’t trying to be like her. I don’t know… I’ve seen the before and after pictures. You look a lot different now. Or maybe it is in fact just media speculation. Maybe you just had your lips enhanced so you could kiss all your children at once. I’m not sure. However, Angelina Jolie only has six kids, not fourteen. Plus she has Brad Pitt and loads of money to support them. I’m sure you’ve gotten all sorts of donations, but one day the donations will stop coming in and you’ll be on you own. Maybe then you could start looking for a job!
   

Perhaps when you first got pregnant it seemed like a good idea because once you have a baby, you’re the center of attention. So maybe you figured that eight babies would get you all that attention times eight! However, babies eat, cry, and poop, so you will also have to deal with that times eight.

I just don’t think you thought this thing through. I’m a little concerned, and I don’t think you should have any more children for a while… or ever! Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
 Samantha Villanueva
     
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

sushshaf
Wed Apr 22 2009 18:24
sharon:
what do people think of america? it is what is in the public arena in america that is not in other countries
1. plastic surgery - programmes such as the swan and extreme makeover
2. sarah palin - she was called the "brown wiggle" in australia cause of that silly hand gesture. what sort of politician does that? let alone the winking and the stupid comments
3. hugh hefner and those silly bunnies that lived three in a house with him
4. sheyla whatever her name is in texas with 1 gallon of silicon in each breast
5.people who will attack abortion clinics and kill doctors.
6. george bush
7. that america doesn't nave nationalised medicine and is the only industrialised country not to have it
8. the fact that a doctor would contravene limits self imposed by other ivf doctors and implant so many embryos.
i could go on. i have tried to post but the site keeps on rejecting my other posts. maybe it is the length
Sharon
Wed Apr 22 2009 13:54
Shushaf--you said "nadya is pretty representative of how many americans think and behave. people around the world will watch to see their opinions about america and americans enforced." First, Are you Nadya?? because you are obviously CRAZY!! Do you really think it a good idea that other countries think Nadya is a representation of US Americans??? I certainly hope not!

My hopes is that other countries DO NOT equate Nadya's delusional irresponsible behavior with most of the American public. Most NORMAL Americans think she is WRONG as well as quite MENTALLY UNSTABLE. We all feel for the sad lives of her innocent children (all of them) who it seems are destined to grow up in a completely dysfunctional home. How Sad. Hugging and playing kissy face is not all there is to raising children with proper guidance and structure to assure that THEIR future will be a bright one. With you Nadya --will they learn anything more than how to work the system????

ella
Tue Apr 21 2009 23:36
sushshaf - are you kidding me???? Are you really trying to suggest that her lips and nose job are due to increased blood volume from pregnancy? If that's the case - why is her nose smaller now? You say that Sam's comments are a regurgitation of what others are saying - yes - most sane people tend to agree on things. You suggest that we visit Nadya and help her. SHE DID THIS TO HERSELF. If she is stressed out - she should have taken 30 seconds to think that maybe having 14 children with no husband, no job, no home of her own, etc. was not a rational idea. If you don't think that behavior and decision was crazy and selfish - you are young and inexperienced - and for that matter, crazy. She is taking money off of the taxpayers. Do you not understand that? Who paid the hospital bill? If she didn't think that people would be interested in her having 8 children then why is she trying to sell her story to anyone that will listen? Finally, when you are holding out your hand for donations, setting up web sites for donations then you do have some accountability to people on how you are spending that money. When you are caught on camera shopping constantly and wearing Tory Burch shoes with no job that's a problem. Don't ask me to donate money to your children because you have no job but yet you live in a $500,000 home and wear shoes that are quite expensive. I work (yes, work) too hard for my money. SHe should try that.
sam
Tue Apr 21 2009 23:16
First let me say that I feel incredibly sorry for all of her children. They are truly the victims in her game. I truly believe that she is a pathological liar. From the first Dateline interview to those scary snipets on Radaronline - she has repeatedly lied. The horribly unflattering plastic surgery - who does she think she is kidding? Why hasn't anyone held the before and after pictures up to her and asked her to explain how those huge lips and Michael Jackson nose are not surgical? She said that pregnancy makes her face change - what planet is she on? The planet where people don't work and yet are caught on camera shopping 5-6 times a week. How does a welfare recipient still collect welfare and buy a $500,000 home? And the way that she talks? She sounds like a wanna be phone sex operator. There's an idea Nadya - a job for you. She is a disturbing, crazy, lying, self absorbed lunatic. I wish that they would find homes for her children and she would get a job and have to pay back the money that she has sponged off the government. When I pick up magazines and have to look at her and those lips and that huge forehead - I want to puke. How long are these 15 minute of fame money making schemes of hers' going to pay? Eventually the money/attention will dry up and she will have to sleep in the donated bed she made.
Seriously
Tue Apr 21 2009 18:47
No Nadya--you are the one who sounds extremely young and inexperienced. Except in the area of FRAUD. I certainly hope the American public does not forget that all your breeding began with your ability to collect disability payments for a BAD BACK. How bad is your back when you can carry to term 5 pregnancies (one being twins) and then the ENORMOUS burden of 8. How bad is that back of yours Nadya--bad enough to prevent you from working???? SHAME ON YOU NADYA --Jackie Snider --I AGREE!!!!!!!
Seriously
Tue Apr 21 2009 18:44
No Nadya--you are the one who sounds extremely young and inexperienced. Except in the area of FRAUD. I certainly hope the American public does not forget that all your breeding began with your ability to collect disability payments for a BAD BACK. How bad is your back when you can carry to term 5 pregnancies (one being twins) and then the ENORMOUS burden of 8. How bad is that back of yours Nadya--bad enough to prevent you from working???? SHAME ON YOU NADYA --Jackie Snider --I AGREE!!!!!!!
Seriously
Tue Apr 21 2009 18:42
No Nadya--you are the one who sounds extremely young and inexperienced. Except in the area of FRAUD. I certainly hope the American public does not forget that all your breeding began with your ability to collect disability payments for a BAD BACK. How bad is your back when you can carry to term 5 pregnancies (one being twins) and then the ENORMOUS burden of 8. How bad is that back of yours Nadya--bad enough to prevent you from working???? SHAME ON YOU NADYA --Jackie Snider --I AGREE!!!!!!!
Jennifer Huff
Tue Apr 21 2009 14:14
It is sad to know her situation and choices has attracted so much attention and energy of "normal" people...
jackie snider
Tue Apr 21 2009 11:51
shushaf....OK...I always wanted horses. Does that mean I should go out and purchase 14 because I always wanted them? I don't have the means to support them nor care/train for them myself. But, using Octoc**t's logic, I guess I should go ahead and do that. Maybe hire a publicist prior to bringing the horses home....and starting a donation site on the internet as OOPS! These horses are going to need food, a barn, etc.... Maybe have my publicist get me some interviews on some TV shows and tell the world "That I made a mistake, but the horses are with me now and NOW what am I going to do? I can't do it on my own like I thought I could. It's gonna take more than 1 person to take care of all these horses." Oh....and once the donations come in and I get tons of free help, then I guess I can go blow the $$$$$ on myself. Let's not forget that I can quit my job...and use the excuse that the "horses need me home". I guess I could tell the public that "Once the horses get a little older, I can go back to school and work as a nurse's aide and support all of them". Octoc**t's logic is one of an 8 year old......all fantasy, and NO LOGICAL thinking at all. Also, if her back was sooooo bad that she was receiving disability, how the heck did she get through the pregnancies? From what I saw.....her jumping around on a trampoline with 2 of the older kids ---1 in each arm and bouncing up and down....and especially after having 8 babies, her back is A OK!!! Which means.....she LIED about her back. How about suing someone from a motor vehicle accident on top of that??? What a joke. Actions speak louder than words. Personally, I am appalled that there are dumbasses in this world like her that would play around with little human lives like this...because of their own wants and needs. Clearly there are serious psychological issues. "Normal, responsible" adults do not act like this. And I haven't even touched the fact that EVERYTHING that comes out of her big......fake lips is a LIE. Which is another topic worth discussing. Soooo...she denied spending mega bucks on makeup.....then tops it off by saying she doesn't wear make-up, yet has it on in EVERY video shoot. She denied the plastic surgery.........yet, she had it. She's tries to play herself off as being intelligent...yet she doesn't even realize that food stamps come from the government and are a form of assistance???? And let's not forget the fact that she "poorly attempts" to use BIG words, yet fumbles them all up and doesn't even know the meaning of what she is saying. My guess is she thought that the general public was dumber than her. She guessed wrong. And on an end note.......why the hell would a person want "one more kid" --as she claims--which of course is another lie, when they already have 2 or 3 of the older 6 kids with disabilities? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the gene pool isn't "making it to the top". Why risk having another disabled child? Obviously she hasn't thought it out that if something happens to her......who is going to be there for the disabled ones? (And I'm not talking about now....I'm talking about later on in life....what happens if some of these kids have to be institutionalized when they are adults?? Who will they have in their lives if she is gone? SHe already has 1 autistic one who will not be able to function on his own and lead his own life when he is older.......and God only knows all the problems that these new 8 are going to have....which, that probably won't show up until they are older. So she can go on and on about how "healthy they are now", but she doesn't realize that some of us out there in the real world, DO have more intelligence than her and DO know more about children than her. It's VERY obvious her mother was the one raising the first 6 and that she didn't lift a finger in their care.)
Jane
Tue Apr 21 2009 07:06
Sushhaf,
You sound crazy. I have two children. One has mild learning disorders and it takes all my time to make sure he does well in school. Not to mention just doing laundry and feeding my family. The point is that you don't have children when you don't have the resources (money and time) to give them the proper care.
sushshaf
Mon Apr 20 2009 23:08
with regard to the tv programme, consider this: there are 300million americans, there are 6billion citizens world wide. this is international news. she is the first woman in the world to have 8 surviving babies. if 300 million people do not want to watch the show, who cares? boycott all you want. there are 1.4 billion people in one child policy china and you can guarantee they will lap up this story. unlike america they are not in recession and their economy although it has suffered some contraction is still a boyant 8% growth per annum. i bet they would wear octomom baby clothes. americans unfortunately do not get out enough to understand world psyche. too much navel gazing and self absorption. this birth would not have happened anywhere but in usa. there are ivf doctors around the world. all of them seem to be able to comply with self regulation and do not need it imposed upon them how many embryos to implant. the outrage that americans now exhibit is laughable. nadya is pretty representative of how many americans think and behave. people around the world will watch to see their opinions about america and americans enforced.
sushshaf
Mon Apr 20 2009 22:56
what assistance is she getting now? she would still be getting help for her speech delayed child and the autistic one. those things are not means tested. she would be able to full wic even if she earned up to 115k this tax year, because of the number of kids in the household. joanne killeen said that the donations were not coming in and were not even near the 6 figure range. she did not say she has applied for it she said that if she needs to get it to ensure being able to feed her kids she will and she would not live her life according to other people's opinions.
the guy says she said it was cancer. she actually has/had fibroids which are a type of tumor, however non fatal. they can however cause infertility cause they stop implantation. who is to say that he cannot remember correctly cause he cannot remember and it was a few years ago. he is not a medical professional so who can blame him if he gets it wrong. you are assuming she told him a lie. i never saw any place where it is stated she had an ectopic pregnancy at 16. please provide the link.

you should read the statistics for depression. woman have a 1 in 5 chance of being depressed in their life. being depressed once doesn't mean you are always depressed. she was depressed cause she had wanted a family and it looked like that door was shut to her cause of ectopic pregnancies destroying her fallopian tubes. you don't think any woman would be upset by that? you need to get a few years under your belts to know that life doesn't always turn out how you want it. how you deal with disappointments (and believe me you would be extremely lucky in life if you have none) shows who you are. nadya didn't want for a grand life. she just wanted a family. she has not changed her story from the beginning. her mother said this from day one. her mother who also is her worst critic also said she was a wonderful mother as did her father. a neighbour complained to cps about her and they investigated her. cps thinks she is fine. there is no one way to parent a child. when you have kids you will realise that each child is different and different methods work with different kids. you need to find out each child's "currency" to get them to work with you. again it seems like you are a little young and sheltered in respect to child care. tell me are you going to have kids? if so why? really tell me why properly so that you make it clear to everyone what is your motivation for having kids. do not give me some pat comment that you read somewhere.

Amber
Mon Apr 20 2009 21:12
She IS on public assistance. She's mentally unstable and at one point a few years ago, her psychiatrist thought she was a high risk for suicide. She has no parenting skills, as evidenced by her interactions with her children. She even picked a baby up by it's FACE on one of her radaronline videos. Her mother took care of her first six children, not Nadya. Octomom has told numerous lies, telling her mom she wasn't getting disability benefits, despite pocketing 165K, the cancer she said she had to coerce a guy into donating sperm, stating she'd never even kissed a boy when she was 19 despite an ectopic pregnancy at 16 and so on and so on. It sure was odd on her radaronline video when she said that each person must learn to be complete within theirselves, without looking to others for outside gratification when she had FOURTEEN children because she needed a huge family to surround her with love. She's nuts.
Lonny
Mon Apr 20 2009 17:47
Sushshaf, she may not be receiving public funding, but the taxpayer is funding quite a lot of what she is doing!
Lilli
Mon Apr 20 2009 17:30
And would you, Sushshaf, happen to be Nadya's "pen name". She is SO on public assistance and has admitted to even applying for more. Her stupid TV show (documentary, yeah right) won't be aired here because there would be no sponsors. Any sponsors would be boycotted. She has done nothing but run around outside the house since all the babies have been home. Kate Gosselin said she didn't get out for months. Other people do errands, and Nadya should be staying with her babies and those very disorderly other 6 children. They are absolute terrors with no manners. The latest video from Radaronline shows her actually saying to one of the attention starved children, "Don't kick the babies". Hello, child protective people, are you listening???? She comes out in public and makes a worse mess of things by opening her mouth. It is obvious she is a very unfit mother. The videos of her "typical day" were shocking. Running around the house with a baby in her arms and a bottle stuck in it's mouth, while trying to coerce the oldest child to eat what was served to him, but he refused. She then runs after one of the many nannies and instructs her to make him a sandwich. This situation is out of control and the babies should be taken away from her before something really bad happens to them. She can't even control the 6 she has.
sushshaf
Mon Apr 20 2009 17:19
sam, so funny. not!
i think by the time you have two babies you realise you are not getting attention. you are a slave to the babies. as you say babies eat, cry and poop. do you think they clean themselves ?
who cares if she looks like angelina jolie. look at nadya when the babies were first born and look at her now. she has lost weight. when you are pregnant there is increased blood volume and that doesn't stay just around the abdomen. it circulates all over the body.
i think what you have written is just regurgiation of what others have written. why don't you go to visit nadya and see for yourself who she is.
think about this: how much work is it for you to look after yourself, to cook food and clean up, to wash and maintain your body, to keep your home tidy, to wash and maintain your clothing. now times that by 15. when you go to visit nadya do something to help her, do a load of washing and folding for her while you are there.
she didn't do this for media attention. if you read the joanne killeen interview she said nadya didn't understand why people would be interested in her as she was just a mom. nadya studied child psychology not media nor marketing which would tie in with your "theory". use your brain and really think about what her life is like.
are you aware that the hospital made all sorts of demands on her before they would release the babies. the older kids are probably the biggest threat of germs for her new babies. she was told to go and buy all new toys for the new house and not bring the old ones for the old house. thus you are making judgements without knowing the circumstances. it isn't nadya's job to explain to you how she spends her money. she isn't receiving any public funding and is not answerable to anyone. and on a personal note do you wear makeup only to "catch a guy"?
you sound extremely young and inexperienced. maybe in time you will know the work involved in having a family instead of writing this tripe!






log out